Cathy Wilcox Training

T: +44 (0)1844 345519
  • Home
  • About us
  • Courses for lawyers
    • Brush up your grammar and punctuation
    • Client-focused legal writing
    • High-impact emails
    • Effective legal drafting
    • Persuasive proposals – Writing to win
    • Effective report-writing
    • Writing for publication
  • Courses for business
    • Brush up your grammar and punctuation
    • High-impact emails
    • Effective minute-taking
    • Effective business writing
    • Persuasive proposals – Writing to win
    • Effective report-writing
    • Writing for publication
  • Virtual training
  • E-learning
  • One-to-one
  • Resources
  • Clients
    • Clients – law firms
    • Clients – companies/others
  • News
  • Contact

Tautology at the gym!

January 29, 2018 by Cathy Wilcox

The running machine is where I catch up on what’s hot and what’s not in the music world. I’m afraid the grammar geek in me couldn’t get over one lyric this morning. Great new song by Ramz – “Barking”. But his line “7 a.m. in the morning”… When else could 7 a.m. be? He could so easily have changed it to “7 o’clock in the morning”…

Filed Under: Effective business writing, Grammar and punctuation, latest news, Plain English

Commas before “and” hit the headlines again

March 17, 2017 by Cathy Wilcox

I’m a big fan of putting a comma before “and” when it helps the reader and adds clarity. I read this in Metro yesterday:

“They needed a flat that was affordable but also within easy reach of work and Lewisham, with a DLR station, was perfect.”

With no comma after “and“, most of us will read “within easy reach of work and Lewisham“, get confused, and have to re-read it to make sense of it. A comma before the “and” would have solved the problem and made our lives easier.

What is the Oxford comma? It’s where, in a list of three or more items, you put a comma after the second-last item and before the “and“:

“Apples, bananas, and pears“.

Mostly you don’t need it, but occasionally it’s useful:

“I shop at Sainsbury’s, Marks and Spencer, and Lidl.”  [I know that in reality M&S has an ampersand.]

The Americans are generally less keen than we are on the Oxford comma. Indeed the Maine Legislative Drafting Manual instructs lawmakers not to use it. But three truck drivers in Portland, Maine have just won a case in the appeal court that may cost Oakhurst Dairy millions of dollars in a dispute over overtime, just because of the lack of an Oxford comma.

Filed Under: Grammar and punctuation, latest news

“They” as a singular pronoun – what do you think?

May 7, 2016 by Cathy Wilcox

People often use “they” as a way of avoiding saying “he/she”. I tend to duck the issue by using the plural:

If a lawyer wants to take annual leave, he/she must complete a form. [cumbersome]
If a lawyer wants to take annual leave, they must complete a form. [simpler]
Lawyers wanting to take annual leave must complete a form. [I prefer this.]

Lorraine Berry argues that using “they” will help counter sexism:
https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2016/may/05/they-the-singular-pronoun-that-could-solve-sexism-in-english?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

 

Filed Under: Grammar and punctuation, latest news

Is your grammar as good as an eight-year-old’s?

May 6, 2016 by Cathy Wilcox

I’m relieved to have managed full marks on a sample test on the new Key Stage 2 English grammar, punctuation and spelling curriculum. Having spent hours training well educated, intelligent lawyers in the basics of apostrophes, hyphens and commas, I’m all in favour of teaching G&P at school. But I wonder whether primary school children really need to know the difference between a subordinating conjunction and a co-ordinating conjunction…  Here’s the sample test:   https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/439299/Sample_ks2_EnglishGPS_paper1_questions.pdf
And here’s the mark scheme:

Click to access Sample_ks2_EnglishGPS_markscheme.pdf

Filed Under: Grammar and punctuation, latest news

Supreme Court decision upholds the validity of clauses alleged to be penalties

November 4, 2015 by Cathy Wilcox

Anyone drafting liquidated damages clauses should read the Supreme Court’s judgments in the El Makdessi and ParkingEye cases published today, which should make it easier to ensure that these clauses are watertight (see https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2013-0280.html). A seven-judge Supreme Court found the disputed clauses in each case to be valid.

The court upheld the existence of the penalty rule but arguably reduced its scope, finding the concept of a “genuine pre-estimate of loss” to be unhelpful. The true test should now be whether the disputed contractual term is a secondary obligation that imposes a detriment on the contract-breaker that is disproportionate to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in enforcing the primary obligation. In El Makdessi the two disputed clauses were primary obligations and thus not penal. In ParkingEye, the charge levied on overstaying motorists, although high, was not penal for a number of reasons including the fact that it enabled the company to manage the car park efficiently for the benefit of shops, shoppers and motorists.

Filed Under: Contract law basics for business, Effective legal drafting, Grammar and punctuation, latest news

The Idler Academy’s Bad Grammar Awards

May 10, 2013 by Cathy Wilcox

 

Grammar’s in the news again:

https://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/may/03/illiterate-letter-professors-bad-grammar

The first winner of The Idler Academy’s Bad Grammar Award was a group of professors and other educators who wrote an open letter in March this year criticising the revised national curriculum.  Unfortunately their letter was disappointingly poorly written.

Tesco was runner-up.  I wasn’t surprised given the sign I spotted in my local Tesco recently:

“100’s of new products added to our meat, fish and poultry range, in-store now.”

See how you do at the Guardian’s own grammar test:

https://www.guardian.co.uk/teacher-network/teacher-blog/quiz/2013/feb/04/grammar-punctuation-quiz-test

Filed Under: Grammar and punctuation, latest news

City law firms in brand war over banning ‘lazy’ possessive suffixes

April 3, 2013 by Cathy Wilcox

Marvellous April Fools’ Day article by The Lawyer magazine!

https://www.thelawyer.com/3003477.article?cmpid=TL02

Filed Under: Grammar and punctuation

Your grammar test for the weekend

March 22, 2013 by Cathy Wilcox

The following paragraph is full of grammatical, punctuation and other writing errors. See how many you can spot!

“The Board of Electra Ltd. are liasing with their largest creditor in an attempt to set-off there debts from trading in CD’s and DVD’s. Carl Potter, Licenced Insolvency Practitioner, says that “Setting-off debts is a complex area, all in house lawyers should be aware of the rules which can effect the way organizations do business. Many of the relevant Insolvency Rules date back to the mid 1980’s. He acknowleges that less and less people can handle this sort of dispute without expert advise, and that now is the time when experience is needed. “A company that isnt watching it’s back at the moment is a brave one; most realise that they have no choice but to carefully manage their cashflow. Companies want to avoid winding-up proceedings at all costs,” he adds. “Losing you’re business to your creditors with only a few weeks notice must be a businesses worst nightmare.”.

If you’d like to know the answers, please contact us via the Contact page and we’ll email them to you.

Filed Under: Grammar and punctuation

Apostrophes in street signs are here to stay.

March 20, 2013 by Cathy Wilcox

Thank goodness Mid Devon Council have seen sense over their plans to banish all punctuation, including the apostrophe, in their street names. I was gearing up for a rant in this week’s news item but now I can calm down and think of something more exciting to write about instead.

Filed Under: Grammar and punctuation Tagged With: apostrophe, brush up your grammar and punctuation, grammar, grammar training, punctuation

Do correct grammar and punctuation matter these days?

March 11, 2013 by kate

This week I read an interesting article from the Harvard Business Review about the importance of correct grammar and punctuation when job-hunting. I have to say that I agree with the writer (as long as the candidate has all the other necessary skills as well, including emotional intelligence in particular). I was surprised by the torrent of comments, many of them disagreeing vehemently. See what you think!
I Won’t Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here’s Why. – Harvard Business Review

Filed Under: Grammar and punctuation Tagged With: employment, grammar, grammar training, job-hunting, punctuation

Contact:

Cathy Wilcox Training Limited, a company registered in England under company number 08161035
Meadow End, Skittle Green
Bledlow, Princes Risborough
Bucks HP27 9PJ
T: +44 (0)1844 345519
M: +44 (0)7771 842830

linked in logo

Copyright © 2023 Cathy Wilcox Training Ltd | Privacy statement | Terms of business | Terms of website use